Saturday, October 24, 2015

ANALYSIS: The Accreditation of English Language Training Act

10/23/2015 MOD1 ASSIGNMENT

You will critically examine and propose a 500-word (1 page) amendment to the 2010 Accreditation of English Language Training Programs Act (http://www.ice.gov/sevis/accreditation-act/) enacted by the government of the United States of America, and enforced by the United States Department of Homeland Security.  Through examination, you will address: a) the impact of the act on prospective students’ access to education, b) the act’s implications on the field of education in general, and TESOL instructors in the United States in particular, and c) your analysis supported with evidence of what unforeseen ramifications the act has/will have on defining the future of English language curriculum, instruction, and assessment.

“In accordance with the Accreditation Act, all ESL programs of study that are SEVP, Student and Exchange Visitor Program- certified must either possess or have applied for accreditation before Dec. 15, 2011, by a regional or national accrediting agency recognized by the Department of Education,”

             The SEVP Accreditation of English Language Training Programs Act for ESL is a huge step towards equality and fairness in education for nonimmigrant students in the US. This Act provides some governance by the US department of education, that will help ensure exchange students are getting structured and legitimate language classes from “stand-alone,” and “combined schools” whose teacher are properly trained to meet ESL program standards. This, also, means ESL programs will now be regulated to make sure there is systemic growth in ESL programs that really protect and benefit nonimmigrant students. The systemic part of this process of accrediting ESL programs is being able to continuously train, collaborate, and grow programs, to better ESL programs across the country.
            The schools that meet Form I-17 for SEVP, ELT accreditation will ultimately have other schools follow suit that secures an ESL program status- quo for institutions, administrators, teachers.
            Accreditation provides a forum that holds institutions accountable for their actions, and an expectation to be upheld. Reading through the www.ice.gov website, you see the reasons for SEVP initiatives to create safe and regulated programs that prevent false, or unethical exchange programs, that do not fulfill their sponsorship obligations. The SVEP, also, strives to enhance international collaboration.
            There is one blatant implication probable for with The Accreditation of English Language Training programs Act, is the feasibility of the SVEP to oversee and integrate such a large cultural spectrum of educational needs that are in demand for ELA programs. To satisfy all the needs of the varying types of English language needs; i.e., Diversity in language and cultural adaptation in English for specific purposes and English for academic purposes is overwhelming. To expect the SEVP to monitor and set standards for all ELA program training standards, is hard to accept.
            The ramifications that this Act could entail may be that reputable “stand alone” schools cannot meet SVEP accreditation standards because they are so specific to a certain population or culture. I know that DPS, Denver Public schools, ESL programs are more focused on Hispanic populations because there is more demand. However, Vietnamese refugee populations exist in south Denver school, that require specific ESL programs that do not match the needs of Hispanic immigrant ESL programs. ESL standards cannot be combined easily for overall success.
There are usually financial limitations that limit school systems from receiving funding for the minority ESL courses to further serve nonimmigrant students. Basic, but still effective ESL programs could be held back from growth because inadequate recourses that prevent training and accreditation standards. Such regulation for accreditation could even further an economic divide in immigrant and nonimmigrant programs. For uphold ethics in educations, the I-17 Form should, also, enact policy that trains and accredits institutions, administration, and teachers that serve immigrant and refugee ESL programs.


The Accreditation of English Language Training Programs Act. (n.d.). Retrieved October 24, 2015.